Muthaiya vs Inspector of Police — 888/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017722026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

1228/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

888/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

City Cime Branch Coimbatore

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Muthaiya

Adv. Jaisurya sekar

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

25-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Enquiry

13-03-2026

Enquiry

11-03-2026

Enquiry

07-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to Muthaiya in a property fraud case involving forged documents and sale deeds (IPC sections 120(b), 465, 467, 468, 471). The court found that while co-accused A-1 and A-2 were primary actors in the alleged conspiracy and forgery scheme, the petitioner's involvement was minimal—merely introducing another accused to the complainant—with no direct allegations against him. The bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to Muthaiya in a property fraud case involving forged documents and sale deeds (IPC sections 120(b), 465, 467, 468, 471). The court found that while co-accused A-1 and A-2 were primary actors in the alleged conspiracy and forgery scheme, the petitioner's involvement was minimal—merely introducing another accused to the complainant—with no direct allegations against him. The bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case