Muthaiya vs Inspector of Police — 888/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010017722026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1228/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
888/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
81
Police Station
City Cime Branch Coimbatore
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muthaiya
Adv. Jaisurya sekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to Muthaiya in a property fraud case involving forged documents and sale deeds (IPC sections 120(b), 465, 467, 468, 471). The court found that while co-accused A-1 and A-2 were primary actors in the alleged conspiracy and forgery scheme, the petitioner's involvement was minimal—merely introducing another accused to the complainant—with no direct allegations against him. The bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 888/2026
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to Muthaiya in a property fraud case involving forged documents and sale deeds (IPC sections 120(b), 465, 467, 468, 471). The court found that while co-accused A-1 and A-2 were primary actors in the alleged conspiracy and forgery scheme, the petitioner's involvement was minimal—merely introducing another accused to the complainant—with no direct allegations against him. The bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts