Sandhana Pandi vs Inspector of Police, Chettipalayam Police Station. — 885/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017692026

Filing Number

1225/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

885/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

Chettipalayam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sandhana Pandi

    Adv. Priyadharshini.N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Chettipalayam Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dismissed the bail petition of Sandhana Pandi (20), a college student accused under Section 67A of the IT Act for creating a fake Instagram account, downloading photos of 30 college girls, using AI to generate manipulated nude images, and posting 24 of them online. The court denied bail despite the petitioner's 36-day custody citing the serious nature of the offense and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 885/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dismissed the bail petition of Sandhana Pandi (20), a college student accused under Section 67A of the IT Act for creating a fake Instagram account, downloading photos of 30 college girls, using AI to generate manipulated nude images, and posting 24 of them online. The court denied bail despite the petitioner's 36-day custody citing the serious nature of the offense and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case