Dinesh vs Inspector of Police, Kuniyamuthur Police Station. — 872/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017392026

Filing Number

1214/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

872/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh

    Adv. RADHIKA.N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Kuniyamuthur Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the bail petition of Dinesh (age 29) in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.872/2026. The court denied bail despite the accused being in judicial custody for 110 days, citing the serious nature of the charges (knife and weapon attacks on the same woman on multiple occasions), his prior criminal history with two related pending cases, and his pattern of re-offending even after previous bail grants. The court also considered the accused's simultaneous filing of similar bail petitions before the High Court and this court as an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 872/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the bail petition of Dinesh (age 29) in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.872/2026. The court denied bail despite the accused being in judicial custody for 110 days, citing the serious nature of the charges (knife and weapon attacks on the same woman on multiple occasions), his prior criminal history with two related pending cases, and his pattern of re-offending even after previous bail grants. The court also considered the accused's simultaneous filing of similar bail petitions before the High Court and this court as an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case