Karthik vs Inspector of Police — 22/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 r/w 440. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNCB010017302026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

1205/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

426

Police Station

M5 Vadavalli Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 r/w 440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karthik

    Adv. KANNATHASAN R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 22/2026 Summary: Karthik, the owner of a Range Rover vehicle and iPhone seized during a criminal investigation into an alleged armed robbery, sought to modify the bond conditions imposed for their interim custody return. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, partially allowed the revision petition, reducing the surety bond requirement from Rs.50,00,000 with two sureties of equal sum each to Rs.50,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of only Rs.20,000 each. The court found the original bond condition excessive and unachievable while balancing property protection concerns against the petitioner's ability to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Restored

    Principal District Judge

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  9. 18-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge

  10. 17-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge

  11. 15-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge

  12. 09-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge

  13. 25-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge

  14. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  15. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 22/2026 Summary: Karthik, the owner of a Range Rover vehicle and iPhone seized during a criminal investigation into an alleged armed robbery, sought to modify the bond conditions imposed for their interim custody return. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, partially allowed the revision petition, reducing the surety bond requirement from Rs.50,00,000 with two sureties of equal sum each to Rs.50,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of only Rs.20,000 each. The court found the original bond condition excessive and unachievable while balancing property protection concerns against the petitioner's ability to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case