Karthik vs Inspector of Police — 22/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 r/w 440. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 27th April 2026.

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNCB010017302026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

1205/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

426

Police Station

M5 Vadavalli Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 r/w 440

Petitioner(s)

Karthik

Adv. KANNATHASAN R

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

27-04-2026

Disposed

24-04-2026

Orders

20-04-2026

Orders

20-04-2026

Restored

20-04-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case 22/2026 Summary: Karthik, the owner of a Range Rover vehicle and iPhone seized during a criminal investigation into an alleged armed robbery, sought to modify the bond conditions imposed for their interim custody return. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, partially allowed the revision petition, reducing the surety bond requirement from Rs.50,00,000 with two sureties of equal sum each to Rs.50,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of only Rs.20,000 each. The court found the original bond condition excessive and unachievable while balancing property protection concerns against the petitioner's ability to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 22/2026 Summary: Karthik, the owner of a Range Rover vehicle and iPhone seized during a criminal investigation into an alleged armed robbery, sought to modify the bond conditions imposed for their interim custody return. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, partially allowed the revision petition, reducing the surety bond requirement from Rs.50,00,000 with two sureties of equal sum each to Rs.50,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of only Rs.20,000 each. The court found the original bond condition excessive and unachievable while balancing property protection concerns against the petitioner's ability to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case