Karthik vs Inspector of Police — 22/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 r/w 440. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 27th April 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNCB010017302026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
1205/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
426
Police Station
M5 Vadavalli Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karthik
Adv. KANNATHASAN R
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Restored
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Orders |
| 20-04-2026 | Orders |
| 20-04-2026 | Restored |
| 20-04-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 22/2026 Summary: Karthik, the owner of a Range Rover vehicle and iPhone seized during a criminal investigation into an alleged armed robbery, sought to modify the bond conditions imposed for their interim custody return. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, partially allowed the revision petition, reducing the surety bond requirement from Rs.50,00,000 with two sureties of equal sum each to Rs.50,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of only Rs.20,000 each. The court found the original bond condition excessive and unachievable while balancing property protection concerns against the petitioner's ability to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 22/2026 Summary: Karthik, the owner of a Range Rover vehicle and iPhone seized during a criminal investigation into an alleged armed robbery, sought to modify the bond conditions imposed for their interim custody return. The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, partially allowed the revision petition, reducing the surety bond requirement from Rs.50,00,000 with two sureties of equal sum each to Rs.50,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of only Rs.20,000 each. The court found the original bond condition excessive and unachievable while balancing property protection concerns against the petitioner's ability to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts