Jancy vs PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 859/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010017022026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1184/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
859/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
701
Police Station
B5 Singanallur Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jancy
Adv. SIJI SIVADAS
Respondent(s)
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Inspector of Police, Singanallur Police Station.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the bail petition of Mahakrishnan Murugan (A-2) in a theft case involving 35 sovereigns of gold and Rs.1,00,000 cash, citing pending investigation, incomplete recovery of stolen property, and two absconding co-accused. However, the court granted bail to his wife Jancy (A-1) on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, considering her custody period, lack of prior criminal record, and the hardship to their two children, subject to daily police reporting for 15 days and conditions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the bail petition of Mahakrishnan Murugan (A-2) in a theft case involving 35 sovereigns of gold and Rs.1,00,000 cash, citing pending investigation, incomplete recovery of stolen property, and two absconding co-accused. However, the court granted bail to his wife Jancy (A-1) on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, considering her custody period, lack of prior criminal record, and the hardship to their two children, subject to daily police reporting for 15 days and conditions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts