Jancy vs PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 859/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017022026

Filing Number

1184/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

859/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

701

Police Station

B5 Singanallur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jancy

    Adv. SIJI SIVADAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Inspector of Police, Singanallur Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the bail petition of Mahakrishnan Murugan (A-2) in a theft case involving 35 sovereigns of gold and Rs.1,00,000 cash, citing pending investigation, incomplete recovery of stolen property, and two absconding co-accused. However, the court granted bail to his wife Jancy (A-1) on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, considering her custody period, lack of prior criminal record, and the hardship to their two children, subject to daily police reporting for 15 days and conditions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 859/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the bail petition of Mahakrishnan Murugan (A-2) in a theft case involving 35 sovereigns of gold and Rs.1,00,000 cash, citing pending investigation, incomplete recovery of stolen property, and two absconding co-accused. However, the court granted bail to his wife Jancy (A-1) on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, considering her custody period, lack of prior criminal record, and the hardship to their two children, subject to daily police reporting for 15 days and conditions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case