Mahakrishnan Murugan vs PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 858/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017002026

Filing Number

1182/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

858/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

701

Police Station

B5 Singanallur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahakrishnan Murugan

    Adv. SIJI SIVADAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Inspector of Police, Singanallur Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore rejected the bail petition of Mahakrishnan Murugan (CMP 858/2026) charged with theft under Section 305(a) BNS, citing pending investigation, unrecovered stolen property, and absconding co-accused. However, the court granted bail to his wife Jancy (CMP 859/2026) considering her 64-day custody, care of two children, and clean criminal record, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, daily police reporting, and non-interference with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 858/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore rejected the bail petition of Mahakrishnan Murugan (CMP 858/2026) charged with theft under Section 305(a) BNS, citing pending investigation, unrecovered stolen property, and absconding co-accused. However, the court granted bail to his wife Jancy (CMP 859/2026) considering her 64-day custody, care of two children, and clean criminal record, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, daily police reporting, and non-interference with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case