Santhosh vs Inspector of Police — 860/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010016892026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

1175/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

860/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

B14 Kuniyamuthur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santhosh

    Adv. K RAMESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to 22-year-old Santhosh (A-5) in a case involving conspiracy, criminal intimidation, and assault charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 109, and 351(3). The court's decision was based on the fact that victims had already been discharged from hospital, a co-accused was previously granted bail, and there was no direct nexus between the petitioner and the alleged offense. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties of equal value, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 860/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to 22-year-old Santhosh (A-5) in a case involving conspiracy, criminal intimidation, and assault charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 109, and 351(3). The court's decision was based on the fact that victims had already been discharged from hospital, a co-accused was previously granted bail, and there was no direct nexus between the petitioner and the alleged offense. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties of equal value, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case