Pandikannan vs Inspector of Police Sulur — 837/2026

Case under Lotteries Regulation Act, 1998 Section Anticipatory Bail petition sec 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010016392026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

1145/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

837/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

113

Police Station

Sulur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Lotteries Regulation Act, 1998 Section Anticipatory Bail petition sec 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pandikannan

    Adv. Eswaran A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Sulur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to Pandikannan (accused A-3) in a lottery regulation case under sections 5 and 7(3) of the Lotteries Regulation Act, considering that co-accused A-1 and A-2 had already been granted bail and the petitioner had no previous criminal record. The bail was granted subject to conditions including executing a Rs. 10,000 bond, producing two sureties of equal value, daily police reporting for 15 days, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 837/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to Pandikannan (accused A-3) in a lottery regulation case under sections 5 and 7(3) of the Lotteries Regulation Act, considering that co-accused A-1 and A-2 had already been granted bail and the petitioner had no previous criminal record. The bail was granted subject to conditions including executing a Rs. 10,000 bond, producing two sureties of equal value, daily police reporting for 15 days, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case