P GANESAMOORTHY vs THE INSPECTOR OF DCB POLICE — 807/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010015902026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
1109/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
807/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
District Crime Branch, Coimbatore
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P GANESAMOORTHY
Adv. S Selvaraju
P SUBRAMANIYAN
Adv. S Selvaraju
P NAGARATHINAM
Adv. S Selvaraju
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF DCB POLICE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 05-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 02-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (P. Ganeshamoorthy, P. Subramaniyam, and P. Nagarathinam) charged with conspiracy, cheating, forgery, and using forged documents under IPC sections 120(b), 417, 466, 468, and 471. The court found the allegations serious—that the accused fraudulently obtained a duplicate death certificate in 2022 for a person who died in 1984 to wrongfully claim property—and considered the investigation to be in a prime stage, concluding that granting anticipatory bail at that stage would risk witness tampering and absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (P. Ganeshamoorthy, P. Subramaniyam, and P. Nagarathinam) charged with conspiracy, cheating, forgery, and using forged documents under IPC sections 120(b), 417, 466, 468, and 471. The court found the allegations serious—that the accused fraudulently obtained a duplicate death certificate in 2022 for a person who died in 1984 to wrongfully claim property—and considered the investigation to be in a prime stage, concluding that granting anticipatory bail at that stage would risk witness tampering and absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts