Senthilvasan vs Inspector of Police, E2 Peelamedu Police Station. — 768/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB010015252026
Filing Number
1063/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
768/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
740
Police Station
B6 Peelamedu Police Staton
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Senthilvasan
Adv. AJI KUMAR.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, E2 Peelamedu Police Station.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to accused A-1 (Senthilvasan) and anticipatory bail to accused A-3 (Anbushelvan) in a cheating case under BNS Section 318(4), where the accused allegedly defrauded a construction company owner of ₹67 lakhs by posing as loan facilitators offering ₹25 crores. The court accepted both accused's settlement offers of ₹10 lakhs each to the complainant and imposed standard bail conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days, non-absconding, and witness protection undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 768/2026
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted bail to accused A-1 (Senthilvasan) and anticipatory bail to accused A-3 (Anbushelvan) in a cheating case under BNS Section 318(4), where the accused allegedly defrauded a construction company owner of ₹67 lakhs by posing as loan facilitators offering ₹25 crores. The court accepted both accused's settlement offers of ₹10 lakhs each to the complainant and imposed standard bail conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days, non-absconding, and witness protection undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts