Muniyaraj vs Inspector of Police — 756/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010014962026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

1044/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

756/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318, 319, 336, 338 & 340

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muniyaraj

    Adv. S Rajendran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raja @ Muniyaraja, accused of misappropriating Rs. 13 lakh in loan installments collected from 65 self-help groups (SHGs) as a collection agent for Sri Lakshmi Ammal Trust. The court found the prosecution's allegations credible—that the accused collected funds meant for bank deposits, fabricated bank receipts, and misappropriated the money while SHG members' loan accounts were declared as defaulters. Considering the nature of the offence, serious allegations, ongoing investigation, and risk of absconding/witness tampering, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 756/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raja @ Muniyaraja, accused of misappropriating Rs. 13 lakh in loan installments collected from 65 self-help groups (SHGs) as a collection agent for Sri Lakshmi Ammal Trust. The court found the prosecution's allegations credible—that the accused collected funds meant for bank deposits, fabricated bank receipts, and misappropriated the money while SHG members' loan accounts were declared as defaulters. Considering the nature of the offence, serious allegations, ongoing investigation, and risk of absconding/witness tampering, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case