Thulasiammal R vs The Inspector of Police Periyanayakkanpalayam Police Station — 746/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010014572026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

1022/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

746/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thulasiammal R

    Adv. Nandakumar V

  2. 2.Gunasekara Alwar

    Adv. Nandakumar V

  3. 3.Sukumaran

    Adv. Nandakumar V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police Periyanayakkanpalayam Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2) and TNPHW Act section 4, finding that the case arose from a dispute over temple festival conduct with mutual counter-complaints lodged by the parties. The bail was granted subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond per person, two sureties of equal value, daily police reporting for 15 days, and standard non-absconding and non-tampering conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 746/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2) and TNPHW Act section 4, finding that the case arose from a dispute over temple festival conduct with mutual counter-complaints lodged by the parties. The bail was granted subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond per person, two sureties of equal value, daily police reporting for 15 days, and standard non-absconding and non-tampering conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case