A.Revathy vs Inspector of Police — 19/2026
Case under Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 21(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNCB010012802026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
885/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.Revathy
Adv. Prabhu D
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Orders |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and set aside the lower court's order, ordering return of the seized vehicle (Mini Lorry, Reg.No. TN 27 P 1558) to the petitioner as interim custody. The court reasoned that keeping the commercial vehicle idle indefinitely at the police station serves no purpose and causes depreciation, particularly following Supreme Court precedent that seized vehicles should not be retained for extended periods. The vehicle was released subject to stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 bond with sureties, photographic documentation, an undertaking not to alienate or alter it, and production before police/court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and set aside the lower court's order, ordering return of the seized vehicle (Mini Lorry, Reg.No. TN 27 P 1558) to the petitioner as interim custody. The court reasoned that keeping the commercial vehicle idle indefinitely at the police station serves no purpose and causes depreciation, particularly following Supreme Court precedent that seized vehicles should not be retained for extended periods. The vehicle was released subject to stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 bond with sureties, photographic documentation, an undertaking not to alienate or alter it, and production before police/court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts