C VELUMANI vs Inspector of Police — 473/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010009382026

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

648/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

473/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

B2 R.S.Puram Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C VELUMANI

    Adv. PARAMESWARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to C. Velumani, a 43-year-old accused of criminal breach of trust (BNS Section 318) for allegedly selling pledged property to a third party after receiving ₹3.70 lakh advance from another buyer and failing to refund it. The court found it essentially a civil property dispute, noted the petitioner's clean criminal record and permanent residence, and imposed conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, two sureties of ₹10,000 each, daily police reporting for 15 days, and prohibitions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 473/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to C. Velumani, a 43-year-old accused of criminal breach of trust (BNS Section 318) for allegedly selling pledged property to a third party after receiving ₹3.70 lakh advance from another buyer and failing to refund it. The court found it essentially a civil property dispute, noted the petitioner's clean criminal record and permanent residence, and imposed conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, two sureties of ₹10,000 each, daily police reporting for 15 days, and prohibitions on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case