Saravana Kumar vs Inspector of Police — 5/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th March 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNCB010004812026
e-Filing Number
19-01-2026
Filing Number
339/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Coimbatore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
341
Police Station
R2 Perur Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saravana Kumar
Adv. S Babu
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Orders |
| 26-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 16-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 09-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 5/2026 Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore allowed Saravana Kumar's criminal revision petition and ordered the return of his seized Maruti Suzuki car (Reg. No. TN 99 K 4063) as interim custody. The court found that while the vehicle was used in a robbery case (Crime No. 341/2025 under BNS section 310(2)), keeping it idle at the police station served no evidentiary purpose since seizure can be proved through photographs and documentation. Kumar was directed to execute a Rs. 50,000 bond with sureties and comply with conditions including surrendering the RC book and undertaking not to alienate the vehicle without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 5/2026 Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore allowed Saravana Kumar's criminal revision petition and ordered the return of his seized Maruti Suzuki car (Reg. No. TN 99 K 4063) as interim custody. The court found that while the vehicle was used in a robbery case (Crime No. 341/2025 under BNS section 310(2)), keeping it idle at the police station served no evidentiary purpose since seizure can be proved through photographs and documentation. Kumar was directed to execute a Rs. 50,000 bond with sureties and comply with conditions including surrendering the RC book and undertaking not to alienate the vehicle without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts