CHAIN SHANKAR vs NARAYAN LAL SUTHAR Advocate - KHEM RAJ DANGI — 1657/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 16th May 2026.
Civil Original (civil Suite)
CNR: RJUD010000011981
Filing Number
3234/2014
Filing Date
27-Apr-1981
Registration No
1657/2014
Registration Date
27-Apr-1981
Court
DJ ADJ Udaipur District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAIN SHANKAR
Adv. VIKASH SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARAYAN LAL SUTHAR Advocate - KHEM RAJ DANGI
-
2.SMT. DEU BAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 1657/2014 - Chain Shankar v. Narayan Lal Suthar Court Decision (Date: 16.05.2026): The District Judge of Udaipur dismissed the plaintiff's suit challenging the validity of two gift deeds executed on 19.03.1979 and 16.04.1979, wherein Chain Shankar allegedly transferred his property to defendants Narayan Lal and Deu Bai. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove Chain Shankar was mentally incapacitated at the time of executing the deeds. Although Chain Shankar suffered from Schizophrenia from 1978 onwards, no adequate documentary evidence demonstrated he was mentally unsound specifically on those dates or incapable of rational judgment regarding the property transactions. The burden of proof rested on the plaintiff, which remained unmet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-May-2026
Judgment
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Restored
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Apr-2017
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2017
Order
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2017
Order
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2017
Argument on Application
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2017
Order
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2017
Order
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2017
Reply/Say
District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2017
Order
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2017
Order
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2016
Argument on Application
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2016
Argument on Application
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Dec-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
19-Nov-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
08-Nov-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
25-Oct-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
04-Oct-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
17-Sep-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
27-Aug-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
16-Jul-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
10-May-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
16-Apr-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
28-Mar-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
24-Feb-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
28-Jan-2016
Evicence of defendent / Op
ADJ V
-
13-Jan-2016
Argument on Application
ADJ V
-
05-Jan-2016
Argument on Application
ADJ V
-
19-Dec-2015
Argument on Application
ADJ V
-
14-Dec-2015
Argument on Application
ADJ V
-
08-Dec-2015
Argument on Application
ADJ V
-
30-Nov-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
12-Oct-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
14-Sep-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
01-Sep-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
27-Aug-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
03-Aug-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
27-Jul-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
20-Jul-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
13-Jul-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
06-Jul-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
30-Jun-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
26-May-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
28-Apr-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
16-Mar-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
23-Feb-2015
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
27-Oct-2014
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
11-Sep-2014
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
11-Aug-2014
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
24-May-2014
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
29-Mar-2014
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
25-Feb-2014
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
16-Dec-2013
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
ADJ V
-
26-Sep-2013
Evidence
ADJ V
-
11-Apr-2013
Evidence
-
29-Mar-2013
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
-
23-Mar-2013
Arguments
-
13-Mar-2013
Arguments
-
04-Sep-2012
Arguments
-
27-Aug-2012
Arguments
-
16-Jul-2012
Arguments
-
25-Feb-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-1981
Case filed
Registration No. 1657/2014
Case Summary: 1657/2014 - Chain Shankar v. Narayan Lal Suthar Court Decision (Date: 16.05.2026): The District Judge of Udaipur dismissed the plaintiff's suit challenging the validity of two gift deeds executed on 19.03.1979 and 16.04.1979, wherein Chain Shankar allegedly transferred his property to defendants Narayan Lal and Deu Bai. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove Chain Shankar was mentally incapacitated at the time of executing the deeds. Although Chain Shankar suffered from Schizophrenia from 1978 onwards, no adequate documentary evidence demonstrated he was mentally unsound specifically on those dates or incapable of rational judgment regarding the property transactions. The burden of proof rested on the plaintiff, which remained unmet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts