state of rajasthan vs Lakhanlal Advocate - Girraj Singh Gurjar — 128/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJSM150002042022

Filing Number

128/2022

Filing Date

13-May-2015

Registration No

128/2022

Registration Date

13-May-2015

Court

JM - CKB Taluka

Judge

1-Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

294

Police Station

Choth Ka Barwara PS

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,411

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state of rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lakhanlal Advocate - Girraj Singh Gurjar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: 128/2022 Court Decision: The accused Lakhanlal was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 379 (theft) and 411 (dishonestly receiving stolen property) on June 15, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused dishonestly took a Hero Honda Splendor motorcycle (registration AR14 BK 1338) without the owner's consent. Key Reasoning: While the motorcycle was recovered from the accused's possession after a checkpoint stop on December 13, 2014, critical evidentiary gaps undermined the case: the FIR documents were not properly authenticated; an 8-month delay between the theft (July 2014) and recovery cast doubt on continuity; the investigating officer's testimony was absent; and the prosecution could not establish whether the accused originally stole the vehicle or received it as stolen property. The court granted benefit of doubt to the accused, finding the evidence circumstantial rather than conclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  4. 13-Jun-2026

    Order

  5. 13-Jun-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  6. 04-Jun-2026

    Order

  7. 04-Jun-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  8. 01-Jun-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  9. 16-May-2026

    Order

  10. 16-May-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  11. 13-May-2026

    Order

  12. 13-May-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  13. 08-May-2026

    Order

  14. 08-May-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  15. 07-May-2026

    Order

  16. 07-May-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  17. 30-Apr-2026

    Order

  18. 30-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  19. 23-Apr-2026

    Order

  20. 23-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  21. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

  22. 18-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  23. 16-Apr-2026

    Order

  24. 16-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  25. 09-Apr-2026

    Order

  26. 09-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  27. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

  28. 24-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  29. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

  30. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  31. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

  32. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  33. 17-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  34. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  35. 26-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  36. 19-Nov-2025

    Restored

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  37. 24-Oct-2024

    Disposed

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  38. 15-Oct-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  39. 14-Oct-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  40. 07-Oct-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  41. 25-Sep-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Chauth Ka Barwara

  42. 07-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 13-May-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 128/2022 Court Decision: The accused Lakhanlal was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 379 (theft) and 411 (dishonestly receiving stolen property) on June 15, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused dishonestly took a Hero Honda Splendor motorcycle (registration AR14 BK 1338) without the owner's consent. Key Reasoning: While the motorcycle was recovered from the accused's possession after a checkpoint stop on December 13, 2014, critical evidentiary gaps undermined the case: the FIR documents were not properly authenticated; an 8-month delay between the theft (July 2014) and recovery cast doubt on continuity; the investigating officer's testimony was absent; and the prosecution could not establish whether the accused originally stole the vehicle or received it as stolen property. The court granted benefit of doubt to the accused, finding the evidence circumstantial rather than conclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case