MOTILAL vs State of Rajasthan — 247/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJSM010005292026

Filing Number

369/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

247/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Sawai Madhopur HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Kundera PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOTILAL

    Adv. MAGAN LAL MEENA

  2. 2.PRATHVIRAJ

    Adv. MAGAN LAL MEENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Sessions Court in Savai Madhopur, Rajasthan granted bail to petitioners Motilal (age 48) and Prathviraj (age 45) in Case 247/2026 on March 24, 2026. The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC Sections 121(1), 132, and 3(5) for allegedly obstructing government work and assaulting officials on February 23, 2026, the court determined that granting bail was justified based on the case facts and circumstances. The court imposed bail conditions requiring a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court in Savai Madhopur, Rajasthan granted bail to petitioners Motilal (age 48) and Prathviraj (age 45) in Case 247/2026 on March 24, 2026. The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC Sections 121(1), 132, and 3(5) for allegedly obstructing government work and assaulting officials on February 23, 2026, the court determined that granting bail was justified based on the case facts and circumstances. The court imposed bail conditions requiring a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case