HARIOM vs State of Rajasthan — 244/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJSM010005222026

Filing Number

365/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

244/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Sawai Madhopur HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

Mitrapura PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARIOM

    Adv. BHANWAR BALVEER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 244/2026 - HARIOM v. State of Rajasthan Court Decision (24.03.2026): The Session Judge rejected the bail petition filed by Hariom (age 21) under Section 483 CrPC. Hariom was arrested on 07.03.2026 in FIR No. 25/2026 for charges under IPC Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), and Section 66D IT Act related to cybercrime fraud involving "mule accounts." Key Reasoning: The court found substantial evidence that Hariom provided his bank account to cybercriminals for receiving and transferring funds obtained through online fraud schemes, knowingly facilitating multiple cyber fraud transactions totaling thousands of rupees. Although providing an account alone does not make someone the primary perpetrator, the court determined that assisting cyber fraudsters by providing banking infrastructure constitutes complicity serious enough to warrant detention during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 244/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 244/2026 - HARIOM v. State of Rajasthan Court Decision (24.03.2026): The Session Judge rejected the bail petition filed by Hariom (age 21) under Section 483 CrPC. Hariom was arrested on 07.03.2026 in FIR No. 25/2026 for charges under IPC Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), and Section 66D IT Act related to cybercrime fraud involving "mule accounts." Key Reasoning: The court found substantial evidence that Hariom provided his bank account to cybercriminals for receiving and transferring funds obtained through online fraud schemes, knowingly facilitating multiple cyber fraud transactions totaling thousands of rupees. Although providing an account alone does not make someone the primary perpetrator, the court determined that assisting cyber fraudsters by providing banking infrastructure constitutes complicity serious enough to warrant detention during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case