Jairam Kaswa vs Executive officer Advocate - OMPRAKASH BHAKAR — 99/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit O

CNR: RJSK210002872021

Filing Number

172/2021

Filing Date

07-Apr-2017

Registration No

99/2021

Registration Date

07-Apr-2017

Court

CJ JD LAXMANAGARH TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jairam Kaswa

    Adv. NARENDRA CHEJARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Executive officer Advocate - OMPRAKASH BHAKAR

  2. 2.NAGAR PALIKA LAXMANGARH

    Adv. OMPRAKASH BHAKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The court (Civil Judge, Lakshmangarh, Sikar) granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff against the Municipal Corporation, restraining it from demolishing the plaintiff's construction on his leasehold property. The court found that the plaintiff had submitted a construction application as per the approved map and complied with all formalities; the municipality's failure to issue construction permission within two months was its liability, not the plaintiff's. The court directed the municipality to accept the plaintiff's regularization application within one month and not demolish the construction if the plaintiff pays the prescribed fees as per the court's directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  13. 29-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  14. 03-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  15. 30-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  16. 12-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  17. 22-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  18. 16-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  19. 16-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  20. 21-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  21. 06-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  22. 02-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  23. 12-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  24. 31-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  25. 05-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  26. 22-Aug-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  27. 11-Jul-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  28. 23-May-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  29. 02-May-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  30. 09-Mar-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  31. 13-Feb-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  32. 31-Jan-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  33. 17-Jan-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  34. 03-Jan-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  35. 18-Oct-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  36. 12-Jul-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Junior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  37. 08-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 07-Apr-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Civil Judge, Lakshmangarh, Sikar) granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff against the Municipal Corporation, restraining it from demolishing the plaintiff's construction on his leasehold property. The court found that the plaintiff had submitted a construction application as per the approved map and complied with all formalities; the municipality's failure to issue construction permission within two months was its liability, not the plaintiff's. The court directed the municipality to accept the plaintiff's regularization application within one month and not demolish the construction if the plaintiff pays the prescribed fees as per the court's directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case