Indrapal vs Munshi Advocate - DINESH SHARMA — 19/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o39rule1and2. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJSK170000392026

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

JM FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section o39rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Indrapal

    Adv. MR MUKESH BHATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Munshi Advocate - DINESH SHARMA

  2. 2.Shabana bano

    Adv. DINESH SHARMA

  3. 3.Jubeda bano

    Adv. DINESH SHARMA

  4. 4.moh. samir

    Adv. DINESH SHARMA

  5. 5.tehsildar

  6. 6.sub registar

  7. 7.Patawari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Civil Judge of Fatehpur granted an interim injunction (Order 39 Rule 1&2 CPC) in favor of the plaintiff Indrapal against the defendants. The court found a prima facie case favoring the plaintiff, holding that the disputed gift deeds dated 06.08.2025 were potentially invalid since the land originally belonged to the plaintiff, who allegedly never sold it to defendants 1 and 3, and that property transfers exceeding Rs. 100 require registered documents. The defendants were restrained from selling, transferring, or constructing on the disputed property pending the main suit's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Jm

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge of Fatehpur granted an interim injunction (Order 39 Rule 1&2 CPC) in favor of the plaintiff Indrapal against the defendants. The court found a prima facie case favoring the plaintiff, holding that the disputed gift deeds dated 06.08.2025 were potentially invalid since the land originally belonged to the plaintiff, who allegedly never sold it to defendants 1 and 3, and that property transfers exceeding Rs. 100 require registered documents. The defendants were restrained from selling, transferring, or constructing on the disputed property pending the main suit's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case