STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs SARDUL SINGH — 11/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,376,506,323,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 19th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJSK160003942022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
189/2022
Filing Date
14-09-2022
Registration No
11/2022
Registration Date
14-09-2022
Court
ADJ FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
Sadar Fathepur
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Respondent(s)
SARDUL SINGH
DINESH SINGH ALIAS DHAN SINGH
Adv. JITENDRA SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 05-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 13-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Fatehpur (Rajasthan) acquitted accused Dinesh Singh (alias Dhannsingh) of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) on March 19, 2026, due to insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a consistent and credible case, as the victim and her parents provided contradictory statements, reported the alleged incident with a two-year delay without explaining the gap, and their cross-examination revealed they filed the case for financial maintenance rather than genuine grievance. The accused's co-defendant Sardul Singh was separately convicted on August 30, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Fatehpur (Rajasthan) acquitted accused Dinesh Singh (alias Dhannsingh) of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) on March 19, 2026, due to insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a consistent and credible case, as the victim and her parents provided contradictory statements, reported the alleged incident with a two-year delay without explaining the gap, and their cross-examination revealed they filed the case for financial maintenance rather than genuine grievance. The accused's co-defendant Sardul Singh was separately convicted on August 30, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts