Peer Gulam Naseer vs E.O. / Commissioner NagarParishad Advocate - MR MOHAMMED ARIF — 19/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O41. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL

CNR: RJSK160003062025

Filing Number

185/2025

Filing Date

02-Aug-2025

Registration No

19/2025

Registration Date

15-Sep-2025

Court

ADJ FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O41

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Peer Gulam Naseer

    Adv. MR DINESH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.E.O. / Commissioner NagarParishad Advocate - MR MOHAMMED ARIF

  2. 2.Chairman Nagar Parishad

  3. 3.J.En. Nagar Parishad

  4. 4.Manager

    Adv. ANIL BATAR

  5. 5.DISTRICT COLLECTOR

  6. 6.TEHSILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Additional District Judge, Fatehpur dismissed the civil appeal filed by Peer Gulam Naseer against the Municipal Commissioner, finding that the trial court's judgment dated 30.06.2025 rejecting his suit was legally and factually sound under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, as the original suit was not legally sustainable. The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision, rejecting the appellant's contentions regarding incomplete issues and improper discretion granted to recall a prior judgment, emphasizing that allowing the recall was merely a procedural option, not a substantive order requiring reversal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  11. 04-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  14. 16-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  15. 13-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  16. 12-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  17. 11-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  18. 10-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  19. 09-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  20. 07-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  21. 06-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  22. 05-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  23. 04-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  24. 02-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  25. 06-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  26. 06-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  27. 24-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  28. 15-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  29. 12-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  30. 10-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  31. 03-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  32. 30-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  33. 29-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  34. 17-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  35. 15-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  36. 13-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  37. 10-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  38. 09-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  39. 07-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  40. 06-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  41. 26-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 02-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge, Fatehpur dismissed the civil appeal filed by Peer Gulam Naseer against the Municipal Commissioner, finding that the trial court's judgment dated 30.06.2025 rejecting his suit was legally and factually sound under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, as the original suit was not legally sustainable. The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision, rejecting the appellant's contentions regarding incomplete issues and improper discretion granted to recall a prior judgment, emphasizing that allowing the recall was merely a procedural option, not a substantive order requiring reversal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case