STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs ALTAF CHEJARA Advocate - TRILOK SINGH MAHALA — 1/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),115(2),126(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJSK160000062025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2024
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
02-01-2025
Court
ADJ FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
175
Police Station
Kotwali Fathepur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. JAI KAUSHIK
Respondent(s)
ALTAF CHEJARA Advocate - TRILOK SINGH MAHALA
DHIRAJ SAINI
Adv. ANIL BATAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Final arguments
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 06-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 23-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Fatehpur (Rajasthan) acquitted both accused Altaf Chejara and Dheeraj Saini on charges under BNS Section 109(1)/3(5) (criminal conspiracy) on April 8, 2026. The court found that while the victim suffered serious head injuries, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the assault, as both the victim and complainant turned hostile and no eyewitness testimony corroborated the charges. The accused were previously acquitted under Sections 115(2)/3(5) and 126(2)/3(5) (voluntarily causing hurt) through victim settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Fatehpur (Rajasthan) acquitted both accused Altaf Chejara and Dheeraj Saini on charges under BNS Section 109(1)/3(5) (criminal conspiracy) on April 8, 2026. The court found that while the victim suffered serious head injuries, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the assault, as both the victim and complainant turned hostile and no eyewitness testimony corroborated the charges. The accused were previously acquitted under Sections 115(2)/3(5) and 126(2)/3(5) (voluntarily causing hurt) through victim settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts