STATE of Rajasthan vs Smt.suman@santosh Advocate - JASWANT BHURIYA — 2443/2015

Case under --- Section 420467468471193. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

REG. CRI. CASE

CNR: RJSK140007012015

Filing Number

1888/2015

Filing Date

16-Oct-2015

Registration No

2443/2015

Registration Date

16-Oct-2015

Court

ACJM LAXMANGARH TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

BALARAN

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

--- Section 420467468471193

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE of Rajasthan

    Adv. app

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt.suman@santosh Advocate - JASWANT BHURIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted Suman (alias Santosh) of charges under IPC Sections 417, 420, 468, 471, 193, and the Representation of the People Act Section 125. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused forged a transfer certificate to contest for sarpanch (village head) in the 2015 panchayat elections, as key prosecution witnesses turned hostile and the documentary evidence regarding the allegedly forged certificate was not adequately corroborated through expert examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 09-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 23-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 26-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 15-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 03-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 22-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 18-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 17-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 08-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 06-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 25-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 09-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 16-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 21-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 05-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 18-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 30-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 24-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 13-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 11-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 02-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 24-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 15-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 14-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 28-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 11-May-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  38. 09-Feb-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  39. 02-Feb-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  40. 17-Sep-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  41. 07-May-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  42. 24-Mar-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  43. 19-Nov-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  44. 30-Jul-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  45. 12-Feb-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  46. 07-Aug-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  47. 19-Dec-2017

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  48. 19-Sep-2017

    Charge

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  49. 02-May-2017

    Charge

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  50. 17-Jan-2017

    Charge

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  51. 06-Sep-2016

    Charge

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  52. 10-May-2016

    Charge

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  53. 15-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 16-Oct-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2443/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted Suman (alias Santosh) of charges under IPC Sections 417, 420, 468, 471, 193, and the Representation of the People Act Section 125. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused forged a transfer certificate to contest for sarpanch (village head) in the 2015 panchayat elections, as key prosecution witnesses turned hostile and the documentary evidence regarding the allegedly forged certificate was not adequately corroborated through expert examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case