STATE of Rajasthan vs Smt.suman@santosh Advocate - JASWANT BHURIYA — 2443/2015
Case under --- Section 420467468471193. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
REG. CRI. CASE
CNR: RJSK140007012015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1888/2015
Filing Date
16-10-2015
Registration No
2443/2015
Registration Date
16-10-2015
Court
ACJM LAXMANGARH TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
BALARAN
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE of Rajasthan
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
Smt.suman@santosh Advocate - JASWANT BHURIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 24-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 03-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted Suman (alias Santosh) of charges under IPC Sections 417, 420, 468, 471, 193, and the Representation of the People Act Section 125. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused forged a transfer certificate to contest for sarpanch (village head) in the 2015 panchayat elections, as key prosecution witnesses turned hostile and the documentary evidence regarding the allegedly forged certificate was not adequately corroborated through expert examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted Suman (alias Santosh) of charges under IPC Sections 417, 420, 468, 471, 193, and the Representation of the People Act Section 125. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused forged a transfer certificate to contest for sarpanch (village head) in the 2015 panchayat elections, as key prosecution witnesses turned hostile and the documentary evidence regarding the allegedly forged certificate was not adequately corroborated through expert examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts