Kailash vs Sub Divisonal Magistrate — 45/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39R1,2. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed otherwise on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJSK130001022020

Filing Number

102/2020

Filing Date

19-Aug-2020

Registration No

45/2020

Registration Date

20-Aug-2020

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE RINGUS TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed otherwise

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39R1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kailash

    Adv. Raghunath Singh Shekhawat

  2. 2.Banshidhar

    Adv. Raghunath Singh Shekhawat

  3. 3.Girdhari

    Adv. Raghunath Singh Shekhawat

  4. 4.Hanumaan

    Adv. Raghunath Singh Shekhawat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub Divisonal Magistrate

  2. 2.Tahsildar

  3. 3.Patwari Halaka

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Sikar (Rajasthan) rejected the plaintiffs' petition for a temporary injunction against land record modifications. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as the disputed pathway was a pre-existing, customary route that was legally documented in revenue records following proper statutory procedures under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act and Rules. The court determined that the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiffs and that they could not claim irreparable injury, thereby dismissing their application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  12. 13-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  13. 16-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  16. 04-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  17. 17-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  19. 19-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  20. 07-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  21. 23-May-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  22. 15-May-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  23. 05-May-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  24. 22-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  25. 07-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  26. 17-Feb-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  27. 17-Jan-2025

    Orders

    Acjm

  28. 09-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  29. 18-Nov-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  30. 08-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  31. 12-Sep-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  32. 02-Sep-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  33. 22-Jul-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  34. 27-May-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  35. 22-Apr-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  36. 18-Mar-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  37. 26-Feb-2024

    Orders

    Acjm

  38. 05-Dec-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  39. 30-Oct-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  40. 21-Aug-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  41. 01-Aug-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  42. 19-Jul-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  43. 05-Jul-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  44. 24-May-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  45. 15-May-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  46. 24-Apr-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  47. 20-Feb-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  48. 23-Jan-2023

    Orders

    Acjm

  49. 28-Nov-2022

    Orders

    Acjm

  50. 29-Oct-2022

    Orders

    Acjm

  51. 19-Sep-2022

    Orders

    Acjm

  52. 28-Jul-2022

    Orders

    Acjm

  53. 23-May-2022

    Orders

    Acjm

  54. 18-Apr-2022

    Orders

    Acjm

  55. 28-Mar-2022

    Orders

    Acjm

  56. 28-Feb-2022

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  57. 24-Jan-2022

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  58. 10-Dec-2021

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  59. 06-Dec-2021

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  60. 09-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  61. 25-Oct-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  62. 23-Aug-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  63. 10-May-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  64. 17-Apr-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  65. 06-Apr-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  66. 25-Mar-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  67. 09-Mar-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  68. 08-Mar-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  69. 15-Feb-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  70. 18-Jan-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  71. 04-Jan-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  72. 05-Dec-2020

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  73. 21-Nov-2020

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  74. 02-Nov-2020

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  75. 22-Oct-2020

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate

  76. 26-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  77. 19-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Sikar (Rajasthan) rejected the plaintiffs' petition for a temporary injunction against land record modifications. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as the disputed pathway was a pre-existing, customary route that was legally documented in revenue records following proper statutory procedures under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act and Rules. The court determined that the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiffs and that they could not claim irreparable injury, thereby dismissing their application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case