STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs umesh nitharwal Advocate - kailash chand dhayal — 1741/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th April 2026.
REG. CRI. CASE
CNR: RJSK120007262015
Filing Number
601228/2015
Filing Date
16-Dec-2015
Registration No
1741/2015
Registration Date
16-Dec-2015
Court
ACJM RINGUS TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-Acjm
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
384
Police Station
Reengus Thana
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
-
1.umesh nitharwal Advocate - kailash chand dhayal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused Umesh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 134/187, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove the vehicle recklessly causing the victim's death. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including the complainant's failure to name the vehicle driver in the FIR, inconsistencies in witness statements, and lack of independent corroboration linking the accused to the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
15-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
07-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
24-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
23-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
01-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
30-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
24-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
12-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
12-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
14-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
03-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
18-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
14-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
29-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
07-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
07-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
31-Mar-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
09-Dec-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jun-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jul-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Apr-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Sep-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Apr-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 1741/2015
Summary The court acquitted the accused Umesh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 134/187, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove the vehicle recklessly causing the victim's death. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including the complainant's failure to name the vehicle driver in the FIR, inconsistencies in witness statements, and lack of independent corroboration linking the accused to the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts