STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs anil kumar Advocate - Kailash Chand Dhayal — 1656/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304a. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.
REG. CRI. CASE
CNR: RJSK120005042015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
601006/2015
Filing Date
04-09-2015
Registration No
1656/2015
Registration Date
04-09-2015
Court
ACJM RINGUS TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
259
Police Station
Reengus Thana
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
anil kumar Advocate - Kailash Chand Dhayal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 26-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 04-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 10-10-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted Anil Kumar of all charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing death and injury) in a July 14, 2015 vehicular accident case. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the pickup vehicle that caused the accident, as witness testimonies contained contradictions regarding the vehicle number and driver's identity, and the complainant did not identify the driver in the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted Anil Kumar of all charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing death and injury) in a July 14, 2015 vehicular accident case. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the pickup vehicle that caused the accident, as witness testimonies contained contradictions regarding the vehicle number and driver's identity, and the complainant did not identify the driver in the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts