Kalu Singh vs Jagdishprasad — 112/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 09th April 2026.
Complaint
CNR: RJSK120001772019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
175/2019
Filing Date
16-02-2019
Registration No
112/2019
Registration Date
26-02-2019
Court
ACJM RINGUS TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalu Singh
Adv. Mohan Lal Baloda
Respondent(s)
Jagdishprasad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 29-01-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 18-12-2025 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 24-11-2025 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court convicted the accused, Jagdish Prasad, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a bounced check. The complainant (Kaalu Singh) had lent ₹1,00,000 to the accused, who issued a check dated 30.10.2018 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving legal notice, the accused failed to pay the amount, leading to the conviction. The court sentenced the accused to 3 months imprisonment with a fine of ₹1,42,000 to be paid as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court convicted the accused, Jagdish Prasad, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a bounced check. The complainant (Kaalu Singh) had lent ₹1,00,000 to the accused, who issued a check dated 30.10.2018 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving legal notice, the accused failed to pay the amount, leading to the conviction. The court sentenced the accused to 3 months imprisonment with a fine of ₹1,42,000 to be paid as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts