SHUBHASH vs PHOOLA RAM Advocate - SHRI MUKESH BHATARA — 313/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJSK110009442022

Filing Number

476/2022

Filing Date

17-May-2019

Registration No

313/2022

Registration Date

17-May-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHUBHASH

    Adv. MR KAPIL DAHIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PHOOLA RAM Advocate - SHRI MUKESH BHATARA

  2. 2.Bhojraj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Fatehpur dismissed the plaintiff Subhash's suit for permanent injunction against defendants Fullaram and others regarding disputed agricultural plots (1, 2, 3, and 4). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish valid and established possession of plots 1, 2, and 4 on the date of the suit, as he could not produce any documentary evidence of ownership or possession despite claiming to have purchased them through an unregistered deed from old survey number 347. Consequently, both the plaintiff's suit and defendant 1's counter-claim were rejected, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Acjm

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 03-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 07-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 30-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    Acjm

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Acjm

  16. 31-May-2025

    Compliance

    Acjm

  17. 28-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    Acjm

  18. 10-Feb-2025

    Compliance

    Acjm

  19. 07-Dec-2024

    Compliance

    Acjm

  20. 30-Sep-2024

    Compliance

    Acjm

  21. 22-Jul-2024

    Compliance

    Acjm

  22. 04-Mar-2024

    Compliance

    Acjm

  23. 11-Dec-2023

    Compliance

    Acjm

  24. 28-Aug-2023

    Compliance

    Acjm

  25. 24-Apr-2023

    Compliance

    Acjm

  26. 16-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 17-May-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 313/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Fatehpur dismissed the plaintiff Subhash's suit for permanent injunction against defendants Fullaram and others regarding disputed agricultural plots (1, 2, 3, and 4). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish valid and established possession of plots 1, 2, and 4 on the date of the suit, as he could not produce any documentary evidence of ownership or possession despite claiming to have purchased them through an unregistered deed from old survey number 347. Consequently, both the plaintiff's suit and defendant 1's counter-claim were rejected, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case