ABDUL RAHAMAN vs E.O NAGARPALIKA Advocate - SHRI ANIL KUMAR MISHRA — 208/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJSK110006862022

Filing Number

345/2022

Filing Date

29-May-2019

Registration No

208/2022

Registration Date

29-May-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL RAHAMAN

    Adv. MR MUKESH BHATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.E.O NAGARPALIKA Advocate - SHRI ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiffs' injunction suit against illegal commercial construction on residential land in Sikar, Rajasthan. The court found that while defendant no. 3 unlawfully constructed multi-story commercial buildings without municipal permission on residential property, the plaintiffs (Abdul Rahman and Sumer Singh) lacked legal standing as they were not neighbors or affected property owners living adjacent to the disputed site. The court ruled that such encroachment matters fall within the jurisdiction of municipal authorities and the property owner, not distant residents, making the plaintiffs ineligible to pursue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Acjm

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 03-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 12-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 19-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  17. 04-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 16-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 24-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 13-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 11-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 21-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 06-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 07-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 27-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 08-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 11-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 16-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 21-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 04-Sep-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  31. 01-Sep-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  32. 17-Aug-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  33. 07-Aug-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  34. 26-Jul-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  35. 03-May-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  36. 19-Apr-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  37. 18-Apr-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  38. 15-Mar-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  39. 22-Feb-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  40. 15-Feb-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  41. 20-Jan-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  42. 04-Nov-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  43. 30-Sep-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Acjm

  44. 12-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 29-May-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiffs' injunction suit against illegal commercial construction on residential land in Sikar, Rajasthan. The court found that while defendant no. 3 unlawfully constructed multi-story commercial buildings without municipal permission on residential property, the plaintiffs (Abdul Rahman and Sumer Singh) lacked legal standing as they were not neighbors or affected property owners living adjacent to the disputed site. The court ruled that such encroachment matters fall within the jurisdiction of municipal authorities and the property owner, not distant residents, making the plaintiffs ineligible to pursue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case