santosh kumar sharma through amit sharma vs ramprasad Advocate - MR MUKESH BHATRA — 55/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,R1and2. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 10th March 2026.

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJSK110001782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

178/2026

Filing Date

04-07-2024

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

04-07-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-ACJM

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,R1and2

Petitioner(s)

santosh kumar sharma through amit sharma

Adv. MR KAPIL DAHIYA

Respondent(s)

ramprasad Advocate - MR MUKESH BHATRA

padam kumar

shantiparasad

girdharilal

kishan

sub registrar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ACJM

10-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Judgement

The Senior Civil Judge of Fatehpur Sikri granted an interim injunction in favor of the petitioner (Suresh Kumar) against the defendants, restraining them from selling or damaging the disputed ancestral joint property. The court found a prima facie case, as both parties acknowledged the property's status as undivided ancestral property where no individual co-owner has the right to sell or demolish specific portions without consent. The court applied the three-stage test for interim injunction and ruled in the petitioner's favor under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Senior Civil Judge of Fatehpur Sikri granted an interim injunction in favor of the petitioner (Suresh Kumar) against the defendants, restraining them from selling or damaging the disputed ancestral joint property. The court found a prima facie case, as both parties acknowledged the property's status as undivided ancestral property where no individual co-owner has the right to sell or demolish specific portions without consent. The court applied the three-stage test for interim injunction and ruled in the petitioner's favor under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case