Moolchand vs Gulam rabbani Advocate - SHRI RAJNESH MAHALA — 13/2023
Case under --- Section 39. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 09th April 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJSK110000302023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
29/2023
Filing Date
13-07-2023
Registration No
13/2023
Registration Date
13-07-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Moolchand
Adv. SHRI MUKESH BHATARA
Respondent(s)
Gulam rabbani Advocate - SHRI RAJNESH MAHALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties | |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the plaintiff Moolchand's interim injunction petition against defendant Gulam Rabbani, restraining him from transferring or alienating disputed agricultural land covered by a sale deed dated 08.08.2022. The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor, as the defendant admitted signing the sale deed, and determined that granting the injunction would prevent greater hardship to the plaintiff and avoid multiplicitous litigation. The case will proceed to trial where both parties' evidence will be examined to finally determine the validity of the transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the plaintiff Moolchand's interim injunction petition against defendant Gulam Rabbani, restraining him from transferring or alienating disputed agricultural land covered by a sale deed dated 08.08.2022. The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor, as the defendant admitted signing the sale deed, and determined that granting the injunction would prevent greater hardship to the plaintiff and avoid multiplicitous litigation. The case will proceed to trial where both parties' evidence will be examined to finally determine the validity of the transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts