RAM NIWASH vs YATENDRA SHINGH URF PAPPU — 8/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 80,2. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 20th April 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJSK110000142020
Filing Number
14/2020
Filing Date
09-Dec-2020
Registration No
8/2020
Registration Date
09-Dec-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-Acjm
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM NIWASH
Adv. SHRI RAJKUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.YATENDRA SHINGH URF PAPPU
-
2.nager palika Fatehpur
Adv. MOHAMAD ARIF
-
3.uppanjiyak
-
4.narendra singh
-
5.mahendra singh
-
6.ravindra singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary of Court Decision The Senior Civil Judge of Fatehpur, Sikar (Rajasthan) decided in favor of the plaintiff Ramniwas against defendants Yatendra Singh and others in a land possession dispute. The court determined that the plaintiff rightfully owns disputed plots numbered 3 and 6 based on a registered sale deed dated March 23, 1990, and that the defendants unlawfully occupied and encroached upon these plots on November 23, 2020. The court ordered the defendants to return possession of the disputed plots within two months and pay Rs. 1,000 per month as interim profit compensation to the plaintiff until possession is restored. The court rejected the defendant's procedural objections regarding lack of notice under CPC Section 80. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
30-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
10-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
17-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
07-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
03-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
16-Jan-2026
Defendant Evidence
Acjm
-
15-Jan-2026
Defendant Evidence
Acjm
-
15-Dec-2025
Defendant Evidence
Acjm
-
24-Nov-2025
Defendant Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Nov-2025
Defendant Evidence
Acjm
-
16-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
Acjm
-
08-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
19-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
24-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Aug-2024
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Acjm
-
29-Apr-2024
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Acjm
-
26-Feb-2024
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Acjm
-
12-Jan-2024
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Acjm
-
04-Dec-2023
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Acjm
-
29-Sep-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Acjm
-
07-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
01-May-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Mar-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
30-Jan-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
18-Nov-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
12-Sep-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Jul-2022
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
19-May-2022
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
11-May-2022
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
21-Apr-2022
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
07-Mar-2022
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
31-Jan-2022
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
25-Jan-2022
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
14-Dec-2021
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
09-Nov-2021
Awaiting Report
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
26-Oct-2021
Awaiting Report
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
31-Aug-2021
Awaiting Report
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
28-May-2021
Awaiting Report
Civil Judge Sr Div
-
09-Apr-2021
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
15-Mar-2021
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
08-Feb-2021
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
06-Jan-2021
Awaiting Report
Acjm
-
05-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2020
Summary of Court Decision The Senior Civil Judge of Fatehpur, Sikar (Rajasthan) decided in favor of the plaintiff Ramniwas against defendants Yatendra Singh and others in a land possession dispute. The court determined that the plaintiff rightfully owns disputed plots numbered 3 and 6 based on a registered sale deed dated March 23, 1990, and that the defendants unlawfully occupied and encroached upon these plots on November 23, 2020. The court ordered the defendants to return possession of the disputed plots within two months and pay Rs. 1,000 per month as interim profit compensation to the plaintiff until possession is restored. The court rejected the defendant's procedural objections regarding lack of notice under CPC Section 80. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts