RAM NIWASH vs YATENDRA SHINGH URF PAPPU — 8/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 80,2,. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 20th April 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJSK110000142020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
14/2020
Filing Date
09-12-2020
Registration No
8/2020
Registration Date
09-12-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAM NIWASH
Adv. SHRI RAJKUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
YATENDRA SHINGH URF PAPPU
nager palika Fatehpur
Adv. MOHAMAD ARIF
uppanjiyak
narendra singh
mahendra singh
ravindra singh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 07-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Senior Civil Judge of Fatehpur, Sikar (Rajasthan) decided in favor of the plaintiff Ramniwas against defendants Yatendra Singh and others in a land possession dispute. The court determined that the plaintiff rightfully owns disputed plots numbered 3 and 6 based on a registered sale deed dated March 23, 1990, and that the defendants unlawfully occupied and encroached upon these plots on November 23, 2020. The court ordered the defendants to return possession of the disputed plots within two months and pay Rs. 1,000 per month as interim profit compensation to the plaintiff until possession is restored. The court rejected the defendant's procedural objections regarding lack of notice under CPC Section 80. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Senior Civil Judge of Fatehpur, Sikar (Rajasthan) decided in favor of the plaintiff Ramniwas against defendants Yatendra Singh and others in a land possession dispute. The court determined that the plaintiff rightfully owns disputed plots numbered 3 and 6 based on a registered sale deed dated March 23, 1990, and that the defendants unlawfully occupied and encroached upon these plots on November 23, 2020. The court ordered the defendants to return possession of the disputed plots within two months and pay Rs. 1,000 per month as interim profit compensation to the plaintiff until possession is restored. The court rejected the defendant's procedural objections regarding lack of notice under CPC Section 80. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts