shri chand vs nil — 152/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed otherwise on 02nd April 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJSK100010242021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1022/2021
Filing Date
18-10-2021
Registration No
152/2021
Registration Date
18-10-2021
Court
ACJM FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ
Judge
2-JM
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed otherwise
FIR Details
FIR Number
158
Police Station
Sadar Fathepur
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
shri chand
Adv. MR TRILOK MAHALA
Respondent(s)
nil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JM
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 13-01-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 16-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 04-10-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate of Fatehpur, Sikar rejected the FIR filed by complainant Shrichand against accused Durjansingh, finding the matter to be a civil dispute rather than a criminal case. The court determined that the complainant's brother invested ₹2,26,000 in a boat company with the accused as a personal transaction, and the cheque dishonor issue was a matter of contractual defense between the parties, not criminal misappropriation or fraud. Consequently, the FIR No. 152/2021 was accepted as civil in nature and no criminal proceedings were initiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate of Fatehpur, Sikar rejected the FIR filed by complainant Shrichand against accused Durjansingh, finding the matter to be a civil dispute rather than a criminal case. The court determined that the complainant's brother invested ₹2,26,000 in a boat company with the accused as a personal transaction, and the cheque dishonor issue was a matter of contractual defense between the parties, not criminal misappropriation or fraud. Consequently, the FIR No. 152/2021 was accepted as civil in nature and no criminal proceedings were initiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts