STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs VIDHYADHAR Advocate - MR RAJNESH MAHALA — 518/2021

Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 19/54. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJSK100007762021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

776/2021

Filing Date

09-09-2021

Registration No

518/2021

Registration Date

09-09-2021

Court

ACJM FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-ACJM

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

EXCISE PROTECTION FORCE FATEHPUR THANA

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

RAJASTHAN EXCISE ACT 1950 Section 19/54

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Respondent(s)

VIDHYADHAR Advocate - MR RAJNESH MAHALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ACJM

02-04-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

Final arguments

10-03-2026

Final arguments

17-02-2026

Final arguments

03-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Judgement

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Fatehpur, Rajasthan acquitted Vidyadhar Singh of charges under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for allegedly possessing 140 bottles of illegal liquor. The court found that while liquor was recovered from a field location, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the field belonged to the accused at the time of seizure, as no documentary evidence (revenue records or official verification) was produced to prove his ownership or possession of the location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Fatehpur, Rajasthan acquitted Vidyadhar Singh of charges under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for allegedly possessing 140 bottles of illegal liquor. The court found that while liquor was recovered from a field location, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the field belonged to the accused at the time of seizure, as no documentary evidence (revenue records or official verification) was produced to prove his ownership or possession of the location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case