STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs IRFAN Advocate - MR PANKAJ SHARMA — 65/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJSK100000832021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
83/2021
Filing Date
19-01-2021
Registration No
65/2021
Registration Date
19-01-2021
Court
ACJM FATEHPUR TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
Kotwali Fathepur
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Respondent(s)
IRFAN Advocate - MR PANKAJ SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 08-01-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant | |
| 24-11-2025 | Service of Non-bailable warrant | |
| 15-10-2025 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Irfan on charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, including contradictions about dowry demands and the location of alleged incidents, and observed that marital discord appeared to stem from mutual mistrust rather than the accused's cruelty or dowry harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Irfan on charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, including contradictions about dowry demands and the location of alleged incidents, and observed that marital discord appeared to stem from mutual mistrust rather than the accused's cruelty or dowry harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts