State Government vs Mangilal etc. (16-Phase-V) Advocate - Ravinder Kumar Modi — 173/2022
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,15,29. Status: Final arguments. Next hearing: 13th June 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJSG240003762022
Next Hearing
13th June 2026
Filing Number
242/2022
Filing Date
14-09-2017
Registration No
173/2022
Registration Date
14-09-2017
Court
ADJ SADULSAHAR TALUKA
Judge
1-ADJ
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
Lalgarh Jathan Police Station,Sadulshahar
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. APP Govt. Pleader
Respondent(s)
Mangilal etc. (16-Phase-V) Advocate - Ravinder Kumar Modi
Raju Maan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 21-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 12-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 01-05-2026 | Final arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 173/2022 Outcome: Accused Raju Mann acquitted; benefit of doubt granted and convicted charges under NDPS Act 1985 (Sections 8/15 read with Section 29) dismissed due to insufficient evidence. Key Finding: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that accused Raju Mann possessed or participated in possession of contraband (Doda Post) on July 18, 2017. Critical inconsistencies in witness testimonies and the investigation record, particularly regarding the seizure documentation and chain of custody, rendered the case against him unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 173/2022 Outcome: Accused Raju Mann acquitted; benefit of doubt granted and convicted charges under NDPS Act 1985 (Sections 8/15 read with Section 29) dismissed due to insufficient evidence. Key Finding: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that accused Raju Mann possessed or participated in possession of contraband (Doda Post) on July 18, 2017. Critical inconsistencies in witness testimonies and the investigation record, particularly regarding the seizure documentation and chain of custody, rendered the case against him unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts