Jai Prakash alias J.P. vs State Government — 49/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJSG240001322026
Filing Number
93/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
49/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
ADJ SADULSAHAR TALUKA
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
201
Police Station
Lalgarh Jathan Police Station,Sadulshahar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jai Prakash alias J.P.
Adv. Ravinder Kumar Modi
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 49/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Sadulshahar, Shri Ganganagar granted bail to petitioner Jai Prakash (alias J.P.) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the petitioner was accused of robbery (stealing a gold ring from a bus passenger on August 15, 2025, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), and 309(4) BNS), he had been in judicial custody since October 13, 2025. Considering that a co-accused had already obtained bail from the High Court, the petitioner's permanent residence status (reducing flight risk), the time already spent in custody, and the procedural stage of the case, the court determined bail was justified. Bail Conditions: Petitioner must deposit ₹50,000 as personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each with proper identity verification before the Judicial Magistrate, Sadulshahar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2026
Case Summary: 49/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Sadulshahar, Shri Ganganagar granted bail to petitioner Jai Prakash (alias J.P.) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the petitioner was accused of robbery (stealing a gold ring from a bus passenger on August 15, 2025, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), and 309(4) BNS), he had been in judicial custody since October 13, 2025. Considering that a co-accused had already obtained bail from the High Court, the petitioner's permanent residence status (reducing flight risk), the time already spent in custody, and the procedural stage of the case, the court determined bail was justified. Bail Conditions: Petitioner must deposit ₹50,000 as personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each with proper identity verification before the Judicial Magistrate, Sadulshahar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts