STATE vs KRISHANLAL ETC. Advocate - Satpal Bishnoi — 54/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 398,365,379,120B. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 30th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJSG220003032018
Filing Number
143/2018
Filing Date
18-02-2012
Registration No
54/2018
Registration Date
18-09-2012
Court
ADJ GHARSHANA TALUKA
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. AD.P.P.
Respondent(s)
KRISHANLAL ETC. Advocate - Satpal Bishnoi
AMAN SINGH
MANGILAL
LEKHRAM
SONU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Court in Ghadasana acquitted accused Monu alias Mangilal of charges under IPC sections 328 (poisoning), 365 (abduction), 379 (theft), and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) on February 2, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the key eyewitness (the alleged victim Shravan Kumar) became hostile and refused to identify the accused, investigation procedures were incomplete, and no independent eyewitness corroborated the allegations of drugging and vehicle theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Court in Ghadasana acquitted accused Monu alias Mangilal of charges under IPC sections 328 (poisoning), 365 (abduction), 379 (theft), and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) on February 2, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the key eyewitness (the alleged victim Shravan Kumar) became hostile and refused to identify the accused, investigation procedures were incomplete, and no independent eyewitness corroborated the allegations of drugging and vehicle theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts