Pushpa vs Vijay Pal etc. — 200/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),85,119(1),74,64(1),61(2)(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJSG180016142024
Filing Number
1561/2024
Filing Date
18-Dec-2024
Registration No
200/2024
Registration Date
18-Dec-2024
Court
ACJM SADULSAHAR TALUKA
Judge
1-Acjm
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
375
Police Station
Sadhulsher Police Station Sriganganagar
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pushpa
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijay Pal etc.
-
2.Santro Devi
-
3.Suman
-
4.Rameshwar Lal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Pushpa v. Vijay Pal & Others (Case No. 200/2024) The court rejected the FIR filed by petitioner Pushpa, finding it was a false and fabricated complaint. The investigation revealed that after Pushpa's brother-in-law abandoned his wife (Pushpa's sister-in-law), Pushpa filed baseless allegations of dowry demands and rape against her in-laws out of resentment, lacking any evidentiary support. The court upheld the final police report declaring the case groundless and directed closure of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
25-Feb-2026
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
09-Jan-2026
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
25-Nov-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
09-Oct-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
26-Aug-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
07-Jul-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
06-May-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
24-Mar-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
17-Feb-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
09-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 200/2024
Case Summary: Pushpa v. Vijay Pal & Others (Case No. 200/2024) The court rejected the FIR filed by petitioner Pushpa, finding it was a false and fabricated complaint. The investigation revealed that after Pushpa's brother-in-law abandoned his wife (Pushpa's sister-in-law), Pushpa filed baseless allegations of dowry demands and rape against her in-laws out of resentment, lacking any evidentiary support. The court upheld the final police report declaring the case groundless and directed closure of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts