Pushpa vs Vijay Pal etc. — 200/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),85,119(1),74,64(1),61(2)(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJSG180016142024
Filing Number
1561/2024
Filing Date
18-12-2024
Registration No
200/2024
Registration Date
18-12-2024
Court
ACJM SADULSAHAR TALUKA
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
375
Police Station
Sadhulsher Police Station Sriganganagar
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpa
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vijay Pal etc.
Santro Devi
Suman
Rameshwar Lal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
| 09-01-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
| 25-11-2025 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
| 09-10-2025 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Pushpa v. Vijay Pal & Others (Case No. 200/2024) The court rejected the FIR filed by petitioner Pushpa, finding it was a false and fabricated complaint. The investigation revealed that after Pushpa's brother-in-law abandoned his wife (Pushpa's sister-in-law), Pushpa filed baseless allegations of dowry demands and rape against her in-laws out of resentment, lacking any evidentiary support. The court upheld the final police report declaring the case groundless and directed closure of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Pushpa v. Vijay Pal & Others (Case No. 200/2024) The court rejected the FIR filed by petitioner Pushpa, finding it was a false and fabricated complaint. The investigation revealed that after Pushpa's brother-in-law abandoned his wife (Pushpa's sister-in-law), Pushpa filed baseless allegations of dowry demands and rape against her in-laws out of resentment, lacking any evidentiary support. The court upheld the final police report declaring the case groundless and directed closure of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts