State vs Vijay Kumar Advocate - Thavar Das Sethi — 851/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJSG180015692017
Filing Number
1556/2017
Filing Date
06-Dec-2017
Registration No
851/2017
Registration Date
06-Dec-2017
Court
ACJM SADULSAHAR TALUKA
Judge
2-Jm
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
132
Police Station
Lalgarh Jathan Police Station,SGNR
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijay Kumar Advocate - Thavar Das Sethi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
The court acquitted Vijay Kumar of charges under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restraint) filed in connection with an alleged assault on June 14, 2015. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical deficiencies including the complainant's absence from witness examination, lack of eyewitness testimony, and inconsistencies in witness accounts regarding whether they actually saw the incident occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
28-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
16-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
12-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
27-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Jm
-
21-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Jm
-
07-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Jm
-
27-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Jm
-
20-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
10-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
18-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
24-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
05-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
28-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
21-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
20-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
26-Apr-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
02-Feb-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
23-Nov-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
29-Sep-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
23-Aug-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
22-Jun-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
05-May-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
11-Apr-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
20-Dec-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
17-Aug-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
03-Jun-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
04-Mar-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
26-Nov-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
04-Oct-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
17-Aug-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
05-May-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
29-Jan-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
16-Oct-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
01-Jul-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-May-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
31-Mar-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
17-Dec-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
02-Sep-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
17-Jun-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
16-Feb-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
31-Jan-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
14-Dec-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Aug-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
09-Aug-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Apr-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 851/2017
The court acquitted Vijay Kumar of charges under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restraint) filed in connection with an alleged assault on June 14, 2015. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical deficiencies including the complainant's absence from witness examination, lack of eyewitness testimony, and inconsistencies in witness accounts regarding whether they actually saw the incident occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts