Parvesh vs Karamjeet Kaur etc. — 655/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,465,467,468,471,477A,120B. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th April 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJSG180012462024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1193/2024

Filing Date

24-04-2024

Registration No

655/2024

Registration Date

24-04-2024

Court

ACJM SADULSAHAR TALUKA

Judge

1-ACJM

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

77

Police Station

Lalgarh Jathan Police Station,SGNR

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,465,467,468,471,477A,120B

Petitioner(s)

Parvesh

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Karamjeet Kaur etc.

Rani Kour alias Manjeet Kour

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ACJM

09-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Service of Non-bailable warrant

01-04-2026

Service of Non-bailable warrant

30-03-2026

Service of Non-bailable warrant

25-03-2026

Service of Non-bailable warrant

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order

The court acquitted both accused—Karamjeet Kaur (also known as Kuldeep Kaur) and Rani Kaur (also known as Manjeet Kaur)—of charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, and 120-B. The court found insufficient documentary and oral evidence to prima facie prove the allegations that the accused fraudulently used educational documents to secure an ANGANWADI worker position and misappropriated government funds. The investigation report failed to establish concrete proof of the alleged criminal conspiracy and document forgery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted both accused—Karamjeet Kaur (also known as Kuldeep Kaur) and Rani Kaur (also known as Manjeet Kaur)—of charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, and 120-B. The court found insufficient documentary and oral evidence to prima facie prove the allegations that the accused fraudulently used educational documents to secure an ANGANWADI worker position and misappropriated government funds. The investigation report failed to establish concrete proof of the alleged criminal conspiracy and document forgery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM SADULSAHAR TALUKA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case