State vs Jai Parkash (Phase-V) Advocate - Krishan Kumar Jalap — 3176/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.o - Criminal Origanal

CNR: RJSG180006102016

Filing Number

3125/2016

Filing Date

30-May-2016

Registration No

3176/2016

Registration Date

30-May-2016

Court

ACJM SADULSAHAR TALUKA

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

296

Police Station

Lalgarh Jathan Police Station,SGNR

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 419,420
Indian Medical Council Act Section 15(2)
Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act Section 18C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jai Parkash (Phase-V) Advocate - Krishan Kumar Jalap

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Jai Parkash (3176/2016) The court acquitted the accused Jai Parkash of charges under IPC Sections 419, 420 (fraud) and Medical Council Act 1956 Section 15(2), finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the accused unlawfully practiced medicine or sold drugs without license—key witness testimony was contradictory, no FSL reports confirmed seized medicines were illegal, and the accused's Ayurvedic credentials were not verified or challenged. The court granted benefit of doubt and discharged him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 16-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 04-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 17-Oct-2025

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  16. 27-Aug-2025

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  17. 28-Jul-2025

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  19. 14-Jul-2025

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  20. 02-Jun-2025

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  21. 16-Apr-2025

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  22. 13-Feb-2025

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  23. 19-Dec-2024

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  24. 04-Nov-2024

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  25. 30-Aug-2024

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  26. 26-Jul-2024

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  27. 05-Jun-2024

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  28. 26-Mar-2024

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  29. 31-Jan-2024

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  30. 25-Oct-2023

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  31. 20-May-2023

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  32. 09-Nov-2022

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  33. 09-Jun-2022

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  34. 05-Mar-2022

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  35. 30-Oct-2021

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  36. 15-Jul-2021

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  37. 15-Apr-2021

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  38. 21-Jan-2021

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  39. 09-Oct-2020

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  40. 15-Jul-2020

    Awaiting records

    Acjm

  41. 12-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 11-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 14-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 07-Jun-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 03-Apr-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 07-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 03-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 07-Apr-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 24-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 20-Sep-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 05-Jul-2017

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    Acjm

  52. 07-Jun-2017

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    Acjm

  53. 05-May-2017

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    Acjm

  54. 23-Feb-2017

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    Acjm

  55. 19-Nov-2016

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    Acjm

  56. 26-Aug-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 30-May-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3176/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Jai Parkash (3176/2016) The court acquitted the accused Jai Parkash of charges under IPC Sections 419, 420 (fraud) and Medical Council Act 1956 Section 15(2), finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the accused unlawfully practiced medicine or sold drugs without license—key witness testimony was contradictory, no FSL reports confirmed seized medicines were illegal, and the accused's Ayurvedic credentials were not verified or challenged. The court granted benefit of doubt and discharged him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case