firm k.k. katariya vs PREM KUMR — 87/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 27th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJSG180001592019
Filing Number
159/2019
Filing Date
13-02-2019
Registration No
87/2019
Registration Date
13-02-2019
Court
ACJM SADULSAHAR TALUKA
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
firm k.k. katariya
Adv. Laxmi Narayan Sehgal
Respondent(s)
PREM KUMR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 31-01-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Firm K.K. Katariya v. Prem Kumar (Case 87/2019) The court convicted the defendant Prem Kumar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (No. 980244 dated 29.08.2017 for ₹1,35,000) that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that despite receiving a legal notice and being informed of the dishonor, the defendant failed to make payment, constituting a criminal offense. The defendant was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of ₹1,85,000 to the complainant firm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Firm K.K. Katariya v. Prem Kumar (Case 87/2019) The court convicted the defendant Prem Kumar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (No. 980244 dated 29.08.2017 for ₹1,35,000) that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that despite receiving a legal notice and being informed of the dishonor, the defendant failed to make payment, constituting a criminal offense. The defendant was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of ₹1,85,000 to the complainant firm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts