Karishan Lal vs Mahinder — 20/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,498A. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJSG180001432022
Filing Number
143/2022
Filing Date
23-Feb-2022
Registration No
20/2022
Registration Date
23-Feb-2022
Court
ACJM SADULSAHAR TALUKA
Judge
2-Jm
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Lalgarh Jathan Police Station,SGNR
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karishan Lal
Adv. Major Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahinder
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Karishan Lal v. Mahinder (Case 20/2022) The court accepted the petitioner Karishan Lal's complaint petition regarding the death of his daughter Samestha. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed against accused Mahendra Kumar and Vidya Devi (the deceased's husband and mother-in-law) under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 498-A (cruelty to married woman), based on evidence of dowry-related harassment and suspicious circumstances surrounding the daughter's death on 05.04.2020. The court directed prosecution of both accused persons and fixed a bail bond of ₹5,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
17-Nov-2025
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
19-Aug-2025
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
25-Jun-2025
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
14-May-2025
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
04-Mar-2025
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
31-Jan-2025
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
07-Nov-2024
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
09-Oct-2024
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
30-Aug-2024
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
25-Jun-2024
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
07-May-2024
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Jm
-
16-Apr-2024
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
04-Mar-2024
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
12-Feb-2024
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
12-Jan-2024
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
08-Dec-2023
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Jm
-
17-Oct-2023
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
Acjm
-
30-Sep-2023
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
Acjm
-
28-Aug-2023
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
Acjm
-
20-May-2023
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
Acjm
-
12-Apr-2023
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
Acjm
-
24-Jan-2023
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
Acjm
-
20-Oct-2022
Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence
Acjm
-
23-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2022
Case Summary: Karishan Lal v. Mahinder (Case 20/2022) The court accepted the petitioner Karishan Lal's complaint petition regarding the death of his daughter Samestha. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed against accused Mahendra Kumar and Vidya Devi (the deceased's husband and mother-in-law) under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 498-A (cruelty to married woman), based on evidence of dowry-related harassment and suspicious circumstances surrounding the daughter's death on 05.04.2020. The court directed prosecution of both accused persons and fixed a bail bond of ₹5,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts