Indraj vs Sumitra — 141/2018
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
Family Main Case - FAMILY MAIN
CNR: RJSG090009022018
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
Filing Number
382/2018
Filing Date
13-11-2018
Registration No
141/2018
Registration Date
13-11-2018
Court
ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA
Judge
1-ADJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Indraj
Adv. SOMDUTT
Respondent(s)
Sumitra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 23-01-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 12-11-2025 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 20-09-2025 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 141/2018 (Indraj v. Sumitra) Outcome: Divorce petition ALLOWED. The court granted a decree of dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, effective 28.08.2019. Key Facts: Sunita (petitioner) and Amerik Singh (respondent) filed a joint divorce petition after separating for over four years. Married 14 years ago, the parties had irreconcilable differences and agreed to mutual divorce. Both received maintenance/alimony settlements and custody of their two sons was settled by mutual consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 141/2018 (Indraj v. Sumitra) Outcome: Divorce petition ALLOWED. The court granted a decree of dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, effective 28.08.2019. Key Facts: Sunita (petitioner) and Amerik Singh (respondent) filed a joint divorce petition after separating for over four years. Married 14 years ago, the parties had irreconcilable differences and agreed to mutual divorce. Both received maintenance/alimony settlements and custody of their two sons was settled by mutual consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts