SUKHRAM vs MAMTA — 103/2021

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Family Main Case - FAMILY MAIN

CNR: RJSG090006892021

Filing Number

244/2021

Filing Date

17-Sep-2021

Registration No

103/2021

Registration Date

17-Sep-2021

Court

ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHRAM

    Adv. MAJAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAMTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 103/2021 (Sukhram v. Mamta) The court dismissed Sukhram's divorce petition filed under Section 13(1)(i)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, citing lack of evidence. Although Sukhram alleged that his wife Mamta engaged in cruel behavior, abandoned him, and eloped with another man, he failed to present oral or documentary evidence to substantiate his claims. Despite being given adequate opportunities by the court, Sukhram did not produce any witnesses or evidence, resulting in dismissal of his petition on grounds of insufficient proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  6. 24-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  7. 07-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  8. 27-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  9. 18-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  10. 07-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  11. 21-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  12. 07-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  13. 30-May-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  14. 03-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  15. 29-Feb-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  16. 17-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  17. 02-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  18. 17-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  19. 18-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    ADJ

  20. 11-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  21. 02-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  22. 26-May-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  23. 01-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  24. 02-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  25. 19-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  26. 02-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  27. 17-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  28. 05-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  29. 28-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

  30. 25-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  31. 28-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  32. 15-Dec-2021

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  33. 24-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 17-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 103/2021 (Sukhram v. Mamta) The court dismissed Sukhram's divorce petition filed under Section 13(1)(i)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, citing lack of evidence. Although Sukhram alleged that his wife Mamta engaged in cruel behavior, abandoned him, and eloped with another man, he failed to present oral or documentary evidence to substantiate his claims. Despite being given adequate opportunities by the court, Sukhram did not produce any witnesses or evidence, resulting in dismissal of his petition on grounds of insufficient proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case