State vs Manfulram Advocate - Sukhvinder Singh — 138/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 458,459,323,325,308,427,34. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 06th April 2026.
Sessions Cases
CNR: RJSG090005172013
Filing Number
300630/2015
Filing Date
15-03-2013
Registration No
138/2015
Registration Date
15-03-2013
Court
ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
Anupgarh Police Station,Sri GangaNagar
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. ADLPP 01
Respondent(s)
Manfulram Advocate - Sukhvinder Singh
Shami aka Samsher Singh
Ajeet Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Manfulram & Others (Case 138/2015) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted defendants Manfulram and Ajeet Singh of charges under IPC Sections 458, 459, 323/34, 325/34, 308/34, and 427/34, granting them the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. The third accused, Shami (Samsher Singh), remains a fugitive. The court found significant contradictions and gaps in the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding weapon seizures, eyewitness testimony inconsistencies, and unconfirmed allegations about which specific accused inflicted injuries on the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Manfulram & Others (Case 138/2015) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted defendants Manfulram and Ajeet Singh of charges under IPC Sections 458, 459, 323/34, 325/34, 308/34, and 427/34, granting them the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. The third accused, Shami (Samsher Singh), remains a fugitive. The court found significant contradictions and gaps in the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding weapon seizures, eyewitness testimony inconsistencies, and unconfirmed allegations about which specific accused inflicted injuries on the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts