State vs Manfulram Advocate - Sukhvinder Singh — 138/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 458,459,323,325,308,427,34. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Cases

CNR: RJSG090005172013

Filing Number

300630/2015

Filing Date

15-Mar-2013

Registration No

138/2015

Registration Date

15-Mar-2013

Court

ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

103

Police Station

Anupgarh Police Station,Sri GangaNagar

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 458,459,323,325,308,427,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. ADLPP 01

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manfulram Advocate - Sukhvinder Singh

  2. 2.Shami aka Samsher Singh

  3. 3.Ajeet Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Manfulram & Others (Case 138/2015) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted defendants Manfulram and Ajeet Singh of charges under IPC Sections 458, 459, 323/34, 325/34, 308/34, and 427/34, granting them the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. The third accused, Shami (Samsher Singh), remains a fugitive. The court found significant contradictions and gaps in the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding weapon seizures, eyewitness testimony inconsistencies, and unconfirmed allegations about which specific accused inflicted injuries on the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    ADJ

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    ADJ

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    ADJ

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  12. 02-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  13. 11-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  14. 01-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  17. 31-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  18. 27-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  20. 25-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  21. 06-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  22. 13-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  23. 21-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

  24. 08-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  25. 24-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  26. 31-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  27. 14-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  28. 02-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  29. 15-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  30. 26-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  31. 07-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  32. 17-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  33. 29-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  34. 16-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  35. 04-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  36. 13-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  37. 02-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  38. 20-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  39. 07-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  40. 15-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  41. 14-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  42. 30-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  43. 28-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  44. 19-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  45. 13-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  46. 03-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  47. 07-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  48. 17-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  49. 30-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  50. 05-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  51. 22-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  52. 16-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  53. 20-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  54. 09-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  55. 08-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  56. 08-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  57. 05-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  58. 18-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  59. 17-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  60. 12-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  61. 17-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

  62. 27-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  63. 25-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  64. 02-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  65. 29-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  66. 13-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  67. 15-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  68. 08-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  69. 16-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  70. 04-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  71. 06-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  72. 23-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  73. 28-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  74. 28-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  75. 11-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  76. 31-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  77. 18-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  78. 10-Oct-2019

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  79. 13-Aug-2019

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  80. 28-Jun-2019

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  81. 15-May-2019

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  82. 05-Apr-2019

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  83. 02-Feb-2019

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  84. 17-Nov-2018

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  85. 10-Sep-2018

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  86. 16-Jul-2018

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  87. 31-Mar-2018

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  88. 03-Jan-2018

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  89. 27-Sep-2017

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  90. 28-Aug-2017

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  91. 14-Jun-2017

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  92. 31-Mar-2017

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  93. 30-Jul-2016

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  94. 17-Jun-2016

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  95. 19-May-2016

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  96. 07-May-2016

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  97. 06-May-2016

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  98. 17-Mar-2016

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  99. 30-Nov-2015

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  100. 17-Sep-2015

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  101. 13-Jul-2015

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  102. 12-May-2015

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  103. 29-Apr-2015

    Argument Of Charge/Oral Charge

    ADJ

  104. 01-Mar-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  105. 15-Mar-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Manfulram & Others (Case 138/2015) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted defendants Manfulram and Ajeet Singh of charges under IPC Sections 458, 459, 323/34, 325/34, 308/34, and 427/34, granting them the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. The third accused, Shami (Samsher Singh), remains a fugitive. The court found significant contradictions and gaps in the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding weapon seizures, eyewitness testimony inconsistencies, and unconfirmed allegations about which specific accused inflicted injuries on the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case