Ramswarup vs Rampratap @ pratap etc Advocate - MOOLA RAM — 258/2014
Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 22nd May 2026.
Co - Civil Suit
CNR: RJSG090001692012
Filing Number
792/2014
Filing Date
30-Aug-2012
Registration No
258/2014
Registration Date
30-Aug-2012
Court
ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Last updated 27-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramswarup
Adv. INDRAJ KASWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rampratap @ pratap etc Advocate - MOOLA RAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Ramswarup v. Rampratap (CIS No. 258/2014) Court's Decision: The court allowed plaintiff Ramswarup's suit against defendants Rampratap and others. The court ordered defendants to execute a registered deed within 2 months transferring agricultural land (measuring 5-14 biswa) to plaintiff according to an agreement dated 17.01.2001, after paying remaining dues including stamp duty and registration fees. If defendants default, plaintiff may deposit remaining amount with court and obtain registration through court authority. Defendants were permanently restrained from transferring, mortgaging, or dispossessing plaintiff from the land. Key Reasoning: The court found plaintiff proved through credible witness testimony and documentary evidence (including the 17.01.2001 deed as Exhibit 1) that defendants had agreed to sell the land for Rs. 5,69,500 and received Rs. 5,59,500 in cash, with remaining dues pending. Plaintiff demonstrated possession since 17.01.2001 and willingness to complete the transaction. Defendants' counterclaims regarding forged documents lacked tangible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Restored
ADJ
-
22-May-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
22-May-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
12-May-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
04-May-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
24-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
15-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
04-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
23-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
12-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
25-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
17-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
09-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
31-Jan-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
21-Jan-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
09-Jan-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
19-Dec-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
18-Dec-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
02-Dec-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
20-Nov-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
07-Nov-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
16-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
18-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
18-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
23-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
09-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
01-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
21-May-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
07-May-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
23-Apr-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
15-Apr-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
18-Mar-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
27-Feb-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
12-Feb-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
29-Jan-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
10-Jan-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
09-Jan-2025
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
19-Nov-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
28-Oct-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
07-Oct-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
27-Sep-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
18-Sep-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
18-Jul-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
19-Apr-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
13-Feb-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
19-Dec-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
05-Oct-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
01-Aug-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
29-May-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
25-Apr-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
22-Feb-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
06-Jan-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
18-Oct-2022
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
29-Sep-2022
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
03-Sep-2022
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
15-Jul-2022
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
03-Mar-2022
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
19-Jan-2022
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
25-Nov-2021
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
28-Sep-2021
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
19-Jul-2021
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
23-Apr-2021
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
18-Feb-2021
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
02-Jan-2021
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
05-Oct-2020
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
10-Aug-2020
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
14-May-2020
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
17-Mar-2020
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
06-Jan-2020
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
23-Oct-2019
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
12-Sep-2019
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
23-Jul-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ
-
13-May-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ
-
16-Mar-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ
-
28-Nov-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ
-
23-Aug-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ
-
28-May-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ
-
14-Mar-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ
-
29-Nov-2017
Issues
ADJ
-
13-Jul-2017
Reply/Say
ADJ
-
02-Mar-2017
Reply/Say
ADJ
-
30-Nov-2016
Reply/Say
ADJ
-
30-Jul-2016
Reply/Say
ADJ
-
06-May-2016
Reply/Say
ADJ
-
01-Mar-2016
Reply/Say
ADJ
-
05-Dec-2015
Notice/Summan/Warrent
ADJ
-
29-Oct-2015
Notice/Summan/Warrent
ADJ
-
16-Sep-2015
Notice/Summan/Warrent
ADJ
-
02-May-2015
Notice/Summan/Warrent
ADJ
-
16-Jan-2015
Notice/Summan/Warrent
ADJ
-
29-Mar-2013
Notice/Summan/Warrent
-
16-Nov-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 258/2014
Case Summary: Ramswarup v. Rampratap (CIS No. 258/2014) Court's Decision: The court allowed plaintiff Ramswarup's suit against defendants Rampratap and others. The court ordered defendants to execute a registered deed within 2 months transferring agricultural land (measuring 5-14 biswa) to plaintiff according to an agreement dated 17.01.2001, after paying remaining dues including stamp duty and registration fees. If defendants default, plaintiff may deposit remaining amount with court and obtain registration through court authority. Defendants were permanently restrained from transferring, mortgaging, or dispossessing plaintiff from the land. Key Reasoning: The court found plaintiff proved through credible witness testimony and documentary evidence (including the 17.01.2001 deed as Exhibit 1) that defendants had agreed to sell the land for Rs. 5,69,500 and received Rs. 5,59,500 in cash, with remaining dues pending. Plaintiff demonstrated possession since 17.01.2001 and willingness to complete the transaction. Defendants' counterclaims regarding forged documents lacked tangible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts